Patricia LORENZ
Ridge View Residential College (RVRC), NUS
plorenz@nus.edu.sg
Sub-Theme
Building Learning Relationships
Keywords
Peer teaching, facilitation, collaboration, co-teaching
Category
Paper Presentation
This paper presentation under the sub-theme “Building Learning Relationships” examines how an assessed peer teaching component can be used to facilitate subject matter learning. The notion that students ought to be treated as partners in learning has gained traction in higher education. Nel (2017) suggests that student engagement ought to move beyond purely gathering feedback and argues that students should be collaborators in all aspects of the pedagogical process instead. Matthews et al. (2018) reason that peer-assisted learning models should actively involve students in order to enhance learning. Healey et al. (2015) define collaboration with students in teaching and learning as follows:
Students may take on the role of teachers through peer-learning with staff and assessment or through taking on responsibility for co-teaching with staff and other students.
This gave rise to the notion that an element of collaboration in teaching was to be included in all courses taught. A former research project on learners as partners in the module design process demonstrated that students working in multi-disciplinary teams draw on their varied personal skills and are thus able to tackle complex and challenging tasks (Lorenz & Guan, 2023). This resulted in the understanding that students are able to contribute substantially to the teaching of the subject matter in the form of peer teaching facilitated by small teams. Consequently, team assessments based on seminar-style peer teaching were included in all future courses designed.
In order to incorporate extensive peer-teaching sessions, the course content taught by faculty had to be reduced. Consequently, crucial key concepts are taught by academic staff, while the students are tasked to contextualised these concepts in their own peer teaching sessions. These sessions are split into two components, namely a 20-minute presentation and a 60-minute interactive facilitation segment. The former engages students in extensive research and critical evaluation of the subject matter, which is the foundation for the facilitation segment. For the latter, presenting teams need to create engaging teaching activities that engages their peers more deeply with the presentation topic. These facilitation segments can include gamification, debates, role-play, team-discussions, and any other form of interactive classroom activity.
Three courses offered at Ridge View Residential College (RVRC) use this format to facilitate deep learning. Throughout these courses similar observations have been made. Firstly, most student teams demonstrate excellent research and critical evaluation of the allocated presentation subjects. Albeit overall good team performance, differing levels of deep understanding are often noticeable during the extensive question-and-answer (Q&A) session conducted after the presentations. These differences are usually not based on prior knowledge, but instead on the depth and breadth of research conducted in the preparation for this assignment. Secondly, there are larger differences in the facilitation-based peer teaching segment. This might be contributed to either the lack of effort that a team dedicates to this assignment, which carries a lower weightage than the presentation, or the lack of capabilities and previous exposure to such a task. Hence, some teams create perfectly designed, highly interactive peer teaching sessions, while others are less successful in facilitating deep discussions and learning.
Surveys demonstrate that overall students feel that working on the peer teaching sessions is beneficial to their learning. Across several cohorts, 83.8 to 93.8% of students found that the presentation segment of their peer teaching contributed a lot to their learning, while 67.8 to 91.7% of students felt that the facilitation component contributed a lot to their learning. This is also reflected in their final project, in which students need to consolidate concepts and content learnt in staff-led and peer-teaching sessions throughout the semester.
References
Healey, M., Bovill, C., & Jenkins, A. (2015). Students as partners in learning. In Lea, J. (Ed), Enhancing Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Engaging with the Dimensions of Practice (pp. 141–63). McGraw Hill/Open University Press.
Lorenz, P., & Guan, Y. (2023). Engaging students in cross-disciplinary module design: a case study on the co-creation of a sustainability module in Singapore. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.ss6
Matthews, K. E., Cook-Sather, A., & Healey, M. (2018). Connecting learning, teaching, and research through student–staff partnerships: Toward universities as egalitarian learning communities. In V, Tong., A Standen., & M Sotiriou (Eds.), Shaping higher education with students: ways to connect research and teaching, (pp. 23-29). UCL Press, http://www.jstor.com/stable/j.ctt21c4tcm.7
Nel, L. (2017). Students as collaborators in creating meaningful learning experiences in technology-enhanced classrooms: An engaged scholarship approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(5), 1131-1142. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12549