Sub-Theme
Building Professional Relationships
Keywords
Critical pedagogy, reflective practice, community of practice, adult learning, technology integration
Category
Lightning Talks
In the rapidly evolving landscape of digital learning with generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), adult educators face increasing demands to integrate technology meaningfully into their teaching practices. However, such integration often lacks a critical foundation, reducing technology to a tool rather than a transformative medium for equity and empowerment. This abstract explores how Wink’s (2011) model of critical pedagogy, particularly her reflection cycle, can support professional learning and technology integration among adult educators within a community of practice (CoP). By engaging in dialogic reflection, questioning power structures, and enacting praxis, educators can move beyond surface-level adoption of digital tools toward transformative, learner-centred practices.
Critical Pedagogy and Wink's Reflection Cycle
Critical pedagogy, rooted in the works of Paulo Freire, positions education as a liberatory practice aimed at challenging oppression and empowering learners. Rather than transmitting knowledge, critical pedagogy invites learners and educators to co-construct meaning through dialogue, reflection, and action. Wink (2011) builds on this tradition by offering a structured yet flexible reflection cycle composed of three iterative phases: To Name, To Reflect Critically, and To Act.
- To Name involves identifying and articulating what is happening within educational contexts, uncovering inequities, assumptions, and contradictions in teaching and learning environments.
- To Reflect Critically calls on educators to interrogate these realities using theory, experience, and collaborative inquiry, fostering deeper understanding of systemic forces at play.
- To Act moves educators toward deliberate, informed responses, transforming practice in alignment with critical insights and ethical commitments.
This reflective process sustains an evolving praxis where learning, unlearning, and reimagining are ongoing and collective.
A Community of Practice Grounded in Critical Reflection
When adult educators come together in a community of practice guided by Wink’s reflection cycle, the group becomes more than a hub for technical skill-sharing. It becomes a collaborative, justice-oriented space for inquiry and transformation. In such a CoP, members engage in regular dialogue to share classroom experiences, uncover systemic barriers to meaningful technology use, and consider how these tools intersect with issues of access, identity, and agency.
The phase of To Name may involve observing how dominant technologies marginalise certain learners or constrain authentic engagement. In To Reflect Critically, educators connect these observations to broader discourses on critical digital literacy and pedagogy. During To Act, participants test new approaches, adapting technologies or developing alternatives that amplify student voice, cultural responsiveness, and collaboration.
Importantly, such a CoP frames professional learning not as compliance or top-down training but as a democratic, reciprocal endeavor where educators are positioned as knowledge creators and agents of change.
Application in Practice: A Case Example
A compelling example of this approach is Tech Thursday, a year-long community of practice made up of instructional designers focused on adult learning. Meeting weekly, the group explores the potential of generative AI tools through hands-on experimentation and dialogic inquiry. During To Name, participants identify the promises and tensions of GenAI, from enhanced personalisation to ethical concerns about surveillance, bias, and academic integrity.
As they move into To Reflect Critically, designers engage with scholarly frameworks on AI ethics, digital equity, and pedagogy, critically examining how their own positionalities shape their perceptions and uses of these tools. Weekly journaling becomes a personal reflective anchor, supporting self-awareness and deeper metacognition about their evolving practices.
In the To Act phase, participants prototype learning materials and activities incorporating GenAI tools, ranging from AI-assisted assessment feedback to learner-driven chatbot projects, while documenting the pedagogical, ethical, and technical implications. Shared reflections and iterative feedback loops within the CoP allow for ongoing refinement and mutual learning.
This example illustrates how Wink’s reflection cycle, enacted within a critically oriented CoP, supports adult learning professionals in navigating complex technological change with intentionality, creativity, and care.
Conclusion
By grounding professional development in critical pedagogy and reflective action, adult educators can reimagine technology as a medium for empowerment rather than control. Wink’s (2011) cycle of To Name, To Reflect Critically, and To Act, when applied in a community of practice, enables educators to see more clearly, think more deeply, and teach more justly.
References
Aubrey, K., & Riley, A. (2017). Understanding and using challenging educational theories. SAGE.
Harasim, L. (2017). Learning theory and online technologies. Routledge.
Hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
Wink, J. (2011). Critical pedagogy: Notes from the real world. Pearson.