Marie TAN1, Patrick PHANG1, and Stephen En Rong TAY2
1Integrated Facility Management, School of Engineering, Temasek Polytechnic
2Department of the Built Environment, College of Design and Engineering (CDE), National University of Singapore (NUS)
1 marie_tan@tp.edu.sg; patrick_phang@tp.edu.sg
2 stephen.tay@nus.edu.sg
Sub-Theme
Building Learning Relationships
Keywords
Scenario-based learning, inquiry–based learning, sustainable facility management, higher education pedagogy, student engagement
Category
Lightning Talks
Introduction
In the evolving landscape of tertiary education, innovative pedagogical approaches are necessary to cultivate deeper engagement, critical thinking and industry-relevant skills among students. Specifically, the ability for students to build learning relationships from within the classroom to actual industry examples helps provide an authentic learning environment (Wiggins, 1990). To help with authentic learning, inquiry-based learning (IBL), based on constructivism, has been utilised help enhance student’s learning (Duffy & Raymer, 2010), and is employed in modules within Temasek Polytechnic (TP). To improve current practice, the notion of student generated questions was explored as literature has shown the value of question generation by students in enhancing learning (Causey & Spencer, 2024; Nguyen et al., 2020; Yu & Wu, 2020). Motivated by outcomes from the use of scenario-based student generated questions and answers (sb-SGQA) (Tay, 2024; Tay & Liu, 2023), the Sustainable Facility Management (SFM) module incorporated sb-SGQA. Hence, this study sought to answer the following key questions:
- How does the implementation of a scenario-based approach impact the grade for the specific assignment?
- How does the implementation of a scenario-based approach impact the overall grade for the module?
Methodology
This study employs a comparative analysis of two cohorts enrolled in the SFM module: a control group from 2023 (n=86) and an intervention group from 2024 (n=64). In the module, students were assessed through several assessment components, which includes Project #1 (P1) and Project #2 (P2). P1 was adapted from a facilities takeover assignment to the scenario-based assignment, while P2 remains the same focusing on Green Mark principles. In the restructured assignment (i.e., P1), students were tasked with collaboratively developing scenario-based questions related to sustainable facilities management for P1, fostering peer-led inquiry and practical application of theoretical concepts. This differed from the previous facilities takeover assignment, where students were given a facility context and they had to gather essential building information relevant to an IFM vendor, and analyse the green measures implemented within the building to ensure sustainability. Hence, the intervention for the 2024 control involves students employing a real-life scenario to contextualise questions, along with the corresponding answers. The type of scenarios were left to the student to develop as long as the scenario was relevant to the learning outcomes.
Results and Discussion
Research Question 1
Results from P1, which was the focal point of the intervention, indicated a positive impact (refer to Figure 1). In 2024, the percentage of students achieving an A was slightly higher than in 2023. There was also a marked increase in the distribution of B+ grades, suggesting improved overall comprehension and engagement across a wider range of students. Notably, no students in the intervention cohort received an F grade for P1 as compared to 4.7% in the control cohort, indicating that the scenario-based methodology did not disadvantage lower-performing students. These results agree with a similar study obtained for an engineering course (Du & Tay, 2024).
Research Question 2
Table 1 presents descriptive statistics across the two cohorts. While there is no significant change in the average grade between the two cohorts, the number of failures improved from 3 to 1, and the lowest grade improved from 35.7 to 43.2 (21% increase) out of 100. The results suggests that the scenario-based assignment was helpful in assisting weaker students, while having minimal impact on high performing students.
Performance comparison across the 2023 control and 2024 intervention cohorts
Conclusion
The transition to a scenario-based assignment demonstrated clear benefits for weaker students. First, it was observed that the proportion of higher letter grades was higher with no students obtaining an F in the intervention. Second, the number of failures and lowest grade improved in the intervention cohort. Of significance is that these results were achieved despite a weaker 2024 cohort than 2023, as observed from cohort performance in other modules. Despite the positive results obtained, the authors acknowledge that preliminary results based on comparison of two cohorts could be further substantiated with additional cohorts for comparison, which provides opportunities for further exploration. In addition, there may be instances of uneven contributions by individual students in the group project, which may not translate the benefits of the approach to the students. Another area for future exploration would be the use of AI-supported scenario-based learning. The lack of costs associated with the scenario-based assignment bodes well for future iterations of this intervention, which could consider hybrid models that combine scenario-based inquiry with targeted content support. This case study in a Year 3 module in TP contributes to the growing body of evidence that authentic, applied learning strategies can significantly enrich student experiences by building learning relationships between classroom content and industry practices.
References
Causey, C., & Spencer, A. (2024). Student-generated questions: An exploration of an instructional strategy with young children. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 53, 101608. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101608
Du, H., & Tay, E. R. S. (2024). Leveraging Adult Learners’ Professional Experience Through Scenario-based Student-generated Questions And Answers In Engineering Mechanics. Higher Education Campus Conference, Singapore.
Duffy, T. M., & Raymer, P. L. (2010). A Practical Guide and a Constructivist Rationale for Inquiry Based Learning. Educational Technology, 50(4), 3-15. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44429836
Nguyen, K.-A., Lucas, C., & Leadbeatter, D. (2020). Student generation and peer review of examination questions in the dental curriculum: Enhancing student engagement and learning. European Journal of Dental Education, 24(3), 548-558. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12536
Tay, E. R. S. (2024). A four-year journey in implementing scenario-based student generated questions and answers (sb-SGQAs) across Departments, Colleges, and Institutions SoTL-Asia Talk Series
Tay, E. R. S., & Liu, M. H. (2023). Exploratory Implementation of Scenario-Based Student-Generated Questions for Students from the Humanities and Sciences in a Scientific Inquiry Course. Higher Education Campus Conference, Singapore.
Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 2(1).
Yu, F.-Y., & Wu, W.-S. (2020). Effects of student-generated feedback corresponding to answers to online student-generated questions on learning: What, why, and how? Computers & Education, 145, 103723. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103723